|
Page 5 of 15
Israel and Messianic Judaism
In 1998 I
completed my music studies in Austria and moved to Israel to begin
theological studies at a Bible college in Jerusalem. Studying in Israel and discovering Judaism
opened to me an entirely new world.
Until now, my faith had been mostly based on the gospels and the New
Testament. Although I had read the Old
Testament extensively, I perceived it as a thing of the past that had now been
abolished and replaced by the superior New Covenant. Living in Jerusalem among the Jewish people made me see
and experience that the Torah and the Tanakh (Old Testament) are alive and well
still today.
I saw how
God's Word was being fulfilled before my very eyes with the return of the
Jewish people to the land
of Israel after 2,000
years of exile. Better yet, I could also
experience the spiritual restoration of Israel: the growth of the modern
Messianic Body, Jews who had recognized their Messiah Yeshua, yet who wished to
retain, affirm and live out their Jewishness.
I began to understand the continuity of Judaism and Christianity and how
Jewish Christianity really is. I
realized how gentile Christians such as myself should not adopt an attitude of
spiritual arrogance towards the Jewish People, but rather be conscious of how
much we can, and should, learn from them.
As I saw that the most Jewish thing one can do is to believe in Yeshua,
I also realized how much a true Christian should study Judaism and learn to
love the Jewish People.
This first
contact with Judaism and Messianic Judaism, however, did not win points for the
Catholic Church in my eyes. On the
contrary, I was confronted with its dark past towards the Jewish People. I was shocked to discover that the crusades,
the inquisition, the pogroms and the Holocaust were still haunting nightmares
in the memory of the Jewish Nation.
Worse, these horrific acts were all associated in some way with
Christianity and Jesus Christ Himself.
I soon
understood that anti-Semitism had often found its roots in the error of
"replacement theology", the idea that the Church has now replaced Israel as God's
chosen people. Consequently, I became an
ardent Christian Zionist, convinced that God's covenant and promises to
Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were still valid.
It seemed obvious to me - and still is - that the Jews are still God's
chosen people, and that His promise of the land of Israel
to their descendants as an everlasting possession still stands as a testimony
of His great faithfulness to them.
After my
year of studies and having arrived at a new understanding of Israel, I was fortunate enough to join a
Christian Zionist organization in Jerusalem committed to supporting Israel and
educating Christians about it. This
lasted until March 2001, when I decided to leave Jerusalem and move to Tel Aviv to work with
a Messianic congregation and outreach
center.
Why Search Further?
By this
time, it would seem that my theological position would have been well
established and reached a point of relative stability. I had found a living relationship with the
Messiah, had come to love His People as my own, and had the immense privilege
to live among them and share with them about Yeshua. My position towards Catholicism had also
appeared to reach an irreversible low point.
Not only was it unbiblical and had completely severed its connection
with the roots of Judaism, I thought, it had seemingly become more pagan than
Christian, culminating in the persecution of God's own people in the name of
their Messiah!
Having
found such riches in Evangelicalism and Messianic Judaism and such evil in the
Catholic Church, what then caused such a dramatic change of heart and mind in a
matter of months? I have described at
length the evolution of my opinions to show that nothing short of a miracle has
brought me back to Catholicism. In
addition, the environment I was living in could not have been less conducive to
my return to the Church. Ironically,
it was while living and working in a very
anti-Catholic environment in Tel Aviv that I was to return to the Catholic
Church! God is not without a sense of
humor. At any rate, I hoped at this
point to finally and permanently close the door on Catholicism, but my
integrity demanded that I settle every point before I drove the last
nail into the coffin. Yet there were a
few nagging issues that remained unresolved.
First, I had
met some true Catholic believers. I had
encountered some Catholic charismatics who had shown that they had
a genuine relationship with the Lord. I
remember giving them a hard time about the Mass and Mary, and though their
explanations were not the clearest, they showed through their lives humility,
love and true faith in Christ. I had
also met true Catholic believers in Israel. Of course, there was also the sincere faith
of my parents. This was annoying,
because the very fact that the Catholic Church could produce such good fruit
robbed me of my right to declare it outright a demonic system!
Second, I
was impressed by the sound orthodoxy of the fundamentals of the Christian Faith
(best expressed in the Nicene Creed) taught by the Catholic Church. There was no denying that the Church had
guarded and defended for 2,000 years the key doctrines of the Christian faith,
such as belief in the triune God, the Virgin Birth, Christ's atoning death, his
resurrection, and his expected return in glory.
It seemed odd that a Church in error could also firmly and consistently
teach so much truth. Parallel to this,
the Church's moral teachings were unequalled.
No other church had ever upheld such high standards of morality and
human dignity. Only the Catholic Church
had always persistently refused to waver on controversial issues such as
homosexuality, abortion, extra-marital sex, euthanasia, divorce and
contraception. Accordingly, no other
church has ever produced such a hall of fame of remarkable saints, holy men and
women who gave their lives to love Christ and their neighbor.
Third,
the sort of anti-Catholicism that I encountered baffled me. It was often expressed in an emotional and
judgmental way. Although I could
understand this hostility, stemming from a painful history, I found it to be
seldom based on a solid, rational knowledge of Catholic theology. I certainly cannot judge such an attitude
since I had been a victim of it myself in my zeal for the Gospel and
misunderstanding of the Church's teachings.
Still, it sometimes seemed that to attack the Catholic Church was more
important than to live out the love of Yeshua.
This certainly could not be the Holy Spirit at work. Furthermore, it bothered me that on one hand
there were Catholic believers who lived an exemplary life and sincerely
believed that the Catholic Church was the true church founded by Christ - but
on the other hand, equally sincere Evangelicals or Messianic Jews claimed with
similar vehemence that surely the Catholic Church was the work of the devil and
that the Pope was no other than the antichrist.
How could sincere believers come to such contradictory conclusions? Who was right? Could there be a middle ground?
Fourth, I
began to feel uncomfortable with many Scriptures that were difficult to explain
from a "Protestant" perspective. Why did
Jesus emphasize so strongly in John 6 that one must "eat his flesh and drink
His blood to have eternal life"? Where
was Jesus when He went to preach to the spirits in prison? (1 Pet. 3:19) Why did He seemingly give His disciples the
authority to forgive sins: "If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven
them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained" (John 20:23)?
This
uneasiness only increased when I took a course on early church history. To my surprise, I discovered that
the earliest Christian writings indicated that the first believers held beliefs
and practices strangely similar to Catholic beliefs and practices today. In fact, our professor, although not trying
in any way to defend or support the Catholic Church, openly admitted this
similarity between early Christianity and modern day Catholicism. I wrote a paper on the development of the
doctrine of the Eucharist and apprehensively discovered that the first
Christians unanimously held the bread and wine to be truly the body and
blood of the Lord, offered as a sacrifice to God, just as taught in the
Catholic Church today.
In addition
to this theological questioning, I began to wonder if something was not missing
from the Evangelical and Messianic services I went to. Although carried out by dedicated and sincere
ministers, the "success" of a meeting seemed dependent on so much human effort:
whether the worship was "powerful" enough, or whether the preacher was
sufficiently "anointed". It sometimes
felt as if the congregation was responsible to go up to heaven and pull God
down into the room. Everything seemed so
dependent on our emotions and efforts that sometimes the services were more
exhausting than fulfilling. I also began
to seriously ask myself why there was so much theological disagreement and
division in the Body of Messiah.
Everyone took the Bible as the Word of God and claimed to have the Holy
Spirit to guide him, yet there was perpetual and substantial disagreement about
countless doctrinal issues among Protestants, and even more so among the
Messianic Congregations.
Such were
the thoughts that were hindering me from declaring all-out war on Catholicism
at the beginning of 2001, and that were beginning to erode my confidence in
Evangelicalism and Messianic Judaism.
|